bicubic interpolation method matlab implementation Search Results


90
MathWorks Inc imresize function
Imresize Function, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/imresize function/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
imresize function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc functions with bicubic interpolation
Functions With Bicubic Interpolation, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/functions with bicubic interpolation/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
functions with bicubic interpolation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc imresize function with bicubic interpolation
Imresize Function With Bicubic Interpolation, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/imresize function with bicubic interpolation/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
imresize function with bicubic interpolation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc bicubic interpolation method
Bicubic Interpolation Method, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bicubic interpolation method/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bicubic interpolation method - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc bicubic downsampling
Bicubic Downsampling, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bicubic downsampling/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bicubic downsampling - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc function interp2 with option cubic
Function Interp2 With Option Cubic, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/function interp2 with option cubic/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
function interp2 with option cubic - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc bicubic kernel function
Comparison of <t> bicubic, </t> overcomplete dictionaries, MRBT‐SR‐without perceptual loss, MRBT‐SR‐with perceptual loss on benchmark data
Bicubic Kernel Function, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bicubic kernel function/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bicubic kernel function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc imresize
Comparison of <t> bicubic, </t> overcomplete dictionaries, MRBT‐SR‐without perceptual loss, MRBT‐SR‐with perceptual loss on benchmark data
Imresize, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/imresize/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
imresize - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc bicubic interpolation
Comparison of <t> bicubic, </t> overcomplete dictionaries, MRBT‐SR‐without perceptual loss, MRBT‐SR‐with perceptual loss on benchmark data
Bicubic Interpolation, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bicubic interpolation/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bicubic interpolation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc b imresize
Comparison of <t> bicubic, </t> overcomplete dictionaries, MRBT‐SR‐without perceptual loss, MRBT‐SR‐with perceptual loss on benchmark data
B Imresize, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/b imresize/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
b imresize - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Comparison of  bicubic,  overcomplete dictionaries, MRBT‐SR‐without perceptual loss, MRBT‐SR‐with perceptual loss on benchmark data

Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Article Title: Super‐resolution of brain tumor MRI images based on deep learning

doi: 10.1002/acm2.13758

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of bicubic, overcomplete dictionaries, MRBT‐SR‐without perceptual loss, MRBT‐SR‐with perceptual loss on benchmark data

Article Snippet: Each input axial slice of an MRI T2 FLAIR image was normalized through the following steps: (1) the mean intensity value and the standard deviation of the foreground pixels were calculated, (2) the intensity value was subtracted by mean intensity value, and then divided by the standard deviation value for each pixel (including the background pixels), and (3) the high‐resolution normalized images were downsampled by a scaling factor of four using the MATLAB bicubic kernel function.

Techniques: Comparison

Results of super‐resolution methods: (a) 4× downsampling of the original MRI image, (b) bicubic upsampling, (c) overcomplete dictionaries, (d) enhanced super‐resolution generative adversarial networks, (e) MRI‐based brain tumor super‐resolution (MRBT‐SR) with visual geometry group perceptual loss, (f) MRBT‐SR without perceptual loss, (g) MRBT‐SR with perceptual loss (Stage 1), (h) MRBT‐SR with perceptual loss (Stage 2), (i) MRBT‐SR with perceptual loss (Stage 3), (j) MRBT‐SR with perceptual loss (Stage 4), (k) the original high‐resolution image

Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Article Title: Super‐resolution of brain tumor MRI images based on deep learning

doi: 10.1002/acm2.13758

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of super‐resolution methods: (a) 4× downsampling of the original MRI image, (b) bicubic upsampling, (c) overcomplete dictionaries, (d) enhanced super‐resolution generative adversarial networks, (e) MRI‐based brain tumor super‐resolution (MRBT‐SR) with visual geometry group perceptual loss, (f) MRBT‐SR without perceptual loss, (g) MRBT‐SR with perceptual loss (Stage 1), (h) MRBT‐SR with perceptual loss (Stage 2), (i) MRBT‐SR with perceptual loss (Stage 3), (j) MRBT‐SR with perceptual loss (Stage 4), (k) the original high‐resolution image

Article Snippet: Each input axial slice of an MRI T2 FLAIR image was normalized through the following steps: (1) the mean intensity value and the standard deviation of the foreground pixels were calculated, (2) the intensity value was subtracted by mean intensity value, and then divided by the standard deviation value for each pixel (including the background pixels), and (3) the high‐resolution normalized images were downsampled by a scaling factor of four using the MATLAB bicubic kernel function.

Techniques:

Comparison of improved performance contributed to brain tumor segmentation using different super‐resolution methods

Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Article Title: Super‐resolution of brain tumor MRI images based on deep learning

doi: 10.1002/acm2.13758

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of improved performance contributed to brain tumor segmentation using different super‐resolution methods

Article Snippet: Each input axial slice of an MRI T2 FLAIR image was normalized through the following steps: (1) the mean intensity value and the standard deviation of the foreground pixels were calculated, (2) the intensity value was subtracted by mean intensity value, and then divided by the standard deviation value for each pixel (including the background pixels), and (3) the high‐resolution normalized images were downsampled by a scaling factor of four using the MATLAB bicubic kernel function.

Techniques: Comparison